The Coal Hub
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Premium Content
    • All
    • Climate & Technology
    • Coal Fired Generation
    • Coal Market Outlook
    • Coal Regions
    • Coal Trade
    • Economic Impact
    • Met / Coking Coal
    • Others
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Industry Links
    • Coal Consultants
    • Coal Industry Association
    • Coal Industry News
    • Coal Price & Market Information
    • Government Organisation
    • Think Tank
    • Coal Company
  • Newsletter
  • Videos
  • Other Hubs
    • EUROPEAN GAS HUB
    • GLOBAL LNG HUB
    • GLOBAL MARITIME HUB
  • Subscribe
  • My account
  • Login
SUBSCRIBE
  • Premium Content
    • All
    • Climate & Technology
    • Coal Fired Generation
    • Coal Market Outlook
    • Coal Regions
    • Coal Trade
    • Economic Impact
    • Met / Coking Coal
    • Others
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Industry Links
    • Coal Consultants
    • Coal Industry Association
    • Coal Industry News
    • Coal Price & Market Information
    • Government Organisation
    • Think Tank
    • Coal Company
  • Newsletter
  • Videos
  • Other Hubs
    • EUROPEAN GAS HUB
    • GLOBAL LNG HUB
    • GLOBAL MARITIME HUB
  • Subscribe
  • My account
  • Login
The Coal Hub
No Result
View All Result
Home Coal Prices

IMO 2020, a shipping regulation that may reshape global coal trade

Editor by Editor
5 years ago
min read5 min
IMO 2020, a shipping regulation that may reshape global coal trade
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

By: Alex Younevitch, S&P Global Platts

RELATED POSTS

StableCoin

Russia considers launching stablecoins to settle export supply payments

5 days ago
World-coal-market

World coal market: brief overview

5 days ago
Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe

Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe

6 days ago

It is not uncommon for people in various commodity industries to believe that their markets exist in some kind of a happy bubble, where only the obvious supply and demand forces or targeted regulations can make or ruin their day. This often goes for the world of coal too.

Shipping is a perfect example of a factor which sometimes gets overlooked. This is evident from industry events these days, where shipping is often either deep down on the agenda or is completely absent from it.

The issue here is not ignorance, of course. When it comes to seaborne coal cargoes, any trader worth his salt would still look at the freight element as it affects the CIF price and delivery time of the product.

The real problem is that freight rates have been depressed and often lacking volatility for years due to a persisting oversupply of vessels. With freight at the bottom, the existing arbitrages settled safely and shipping, while always there naturally, was no longer perceived to be a crucial factor in opening or closing trade routes.

However, the times are changing again. In addition to freight already being on a path for recovery amid rising demand, there is an upcoming disruptive regulation from the International Maritime Organization that is likely to shake up the whole playground.

The global sulfur cap of 0.5% on marine fuels that that will come into effect on January 1, 2020 is already seen as a perfect storm by the oil and shipping industries as it may bring extreme volatility in bunker prices.

The most likely outcome is a sharp spike in costs for shipowners. And as happens in any business, these costs shall be passed along to the customers. For anyone involved in seaborne coal trade, this would mean dealing with a dramatic, long-term increase in freight rates.

No easy way out

The new sulphur cap of 0.5% is a sharp drop from the current limit of 3.5% and in simple terms it means that come January 2020, all vessels around the globe will have to burn cleaner and more expensive fuels or take other costly measures in order to comply.

One way that shipowners could go is using special fuel oil blends, which would fall below the 0.5% cap. However, experts are doubtful that the global refining industry will be able to supply such blends in sufficient volume and variety in time for 2020.

Otherwise the industry could go straight to burning Marine gasoil or MGO, which many expect will be the most popular scenario, at least at first. And while MGO is compliant and more readily available, it also much more expensive than conventional IFO 380 bunkers.

Of course, there are a few alternatives available to shipowners, like LNG bunkering or exhaust control systems, also known as scrubbers. However, both have serious drawbacks.

For example, it takes $3-6 million to install a scrubber on a dry bulk vessel, with costs varying depending on the size of the ship and the type of the scrubber. Retrofitting a 5-10 year old ship, considering current vessels prices, would therefore be prohibitively expensive.

It is even harder to justify LNG as the global bunkering solution as the infrastructure required to support it is not there yet and the upfront costs for retrofitting ships are even higher.

Who will pick up the bill?

Whichever way the industry moves, one thing is certain. It won’t be cheap. There are very different estimates from various sources on how much the extra costs for shipping would be, ranging from modest a $5 billion to $70 billion annually, which clearly shows how much uncertainty surrounds the whole issue.

And that is not just the shipping problem. Considering the sorry state of the freight market, shipowners will not be willing or able to absorb such massive extra costs themselves and will have to pass the lion’s share to their customers, who pay the freight. This would be people who trade the actual commodity. And the extra bunker fuel bill can be quite substantial, especially on long-haul voyages.

Let us look at a specific example – the coal arbitrage from Colombia to North East Asia. Obviously Columbia is not the biggest player when it comes to this region. Australia and Russia are as they are much closer to the buyers. However, in both 2016 and 2017, Colombia successfully took a considerable bite out of their market share, selling over 3 million mt /year of bituminous thermal coal to NE Asia.

The graph below compares the Australian and Colombian coal prices, including Panamax freight to NE Asia. For the sake of simplicity it is assumed that freight rates on both routes stayed constant throughout the year.

Source: Platts

It is quite clear that there have been pockets of arbitrage from Colombia throughout the year, when the delivered price of their product was more competitive than that of Australian.

This was made possible by the lack of volatility in the depressed dry bulk freight market, and relatively low bunker prices, which allowed a remote supplier to be competitive. The picture is likely to be very different in 2020 once the new IMO sulfur cap comes into force.

Showing the money

If MGO indeed becomes the go-to fuel for global shipping, the extra bunker expenses may skyrocket, making long-haul freight too expensive and an arbitrage like Colombia to NE Asia unworkable.

To put numbers in perspective, extra costs for one Panamax voyage on this route at current MGO prices, comparing to standard fuel oil would exceed $230,000. According to some estimates, the overwhelming demand for MGO come 2020 could propel its prices 2-3 times higher. Considering the trend for rising oil prices, the extra bill per voyage may easily come to half a million dollars, making the whole arbitrage of 3 million mt costing over $21 million more in just fuel expenses.

Since bunker expenses make up 70-80% of voyage expenses, the freight may easily double, especially on longer routes. However, as can be seen from the graph below, even at a modest 50% freight increase in freight, there would be almost no occasions when the Colombia-NE Asia arb would be workable.


Source: Platts

Certainly, depending on which side of the fence you are sitting on, it might be a good or a bad thing. In general, the further the seller is from his buyer, the more he will be exposed to the negative effects of rising bunker prices. At the same time their short-haul competitors might have a good excuse to smile wider.

You’re not alone

Certainly, it won’t be just coal that will feel the impact of new regulations. The dry bulk market as a whole will be facing it. And since the same tonnage is often used across various dry bulk commodities, issues in one market may affect the other. For example, if the long-haul grain arbitrage from the Black Sea to the East was to suffer, a drop in ton-mile demand may ease the freight burden for US coal exports.

In time, of course, both the oil and shipping industries will readjust to the new realities and both the prices and trade routes will stabilize again. However, before that happens, players in the coal industry should start keeping a closer eye on what is happening with bunkers and shipping to avoid nasty surprises on their P&L sheets in the new decade.

Tags: Alex Younevitchbunker fuelbunkeringdry freightfreightpanamasulphur cap
Editor

Editor

Related Posts

StableCoin
Coal Demand

Russia considers launching stablecoins to settle export supply payments

5 days ago
World-coal-market
Coal Demand

World coal market: brief overview

5 days ago
Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe
Coal Prices

Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe

6 days ago
Global coal consumption: not dead (yet)?
Coal Demand

Global coal consumption: not dead (yet)?

1 week ago
Coal-production-in-Kuzbass
Coal Demand

Coal production in Kuzbass down 8% in 2022

2 weeks ago
World-coal-market
Coal Demand

World coal market: brief overview

2 weeks ago

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Result
View All Result

Trending Posts

World-coal-market

World coal market: brief overview

January 20, 2023
Coal-production-in-Kuzbass

Coal production in Kuzbass down 8% in 2022

February 1, 2023
EU-coal

EU coal’s steep discount to Pacific suggests muted demand

January 13, 2023

Recent Post

StableCoin

Russia considers launching stablecoins to settle export supply payments

February 3, 2023
World-coal-market

World coal market: brief overview

February 3, 2023
Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe

Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe

February 2, 2023
Global coal consumption: not dead (yet)?

Global coal consumption: not dead (yet)?

February 1, 2023
Coal-production-in-Kuzbass

Coal production in Kuzbass down 8% in 2022

February 1, 2023
World-coal-market

World coal market: brief overview

January 27, 2023

The Coal Hub is an online platform for sharing analysis and information about the global coal market  more info

Categories

  • Coal Market Outlook
  • Coal Trade
  • Met / Coking Coal
  • Coal Fired Generation
  • Coal Regions
  • Climate & Technology
  • Economic Impact

Recent Posts

Russia considers launching stablecoins to settle export supply payments

World coal market: brief overview

Pacific coal prices retain record premium over Europe

Energise your Friday!

Sign up to receive our weekly newsletter (each Friday) with new coal market reports, presentations & analysis.

By signing up, I agree to our TOS and Privacy Policy.

© 2020 TheCoalHub | All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Premium Content
    • All
    • Climate & Technology
    • Coal Fired Generation
    • Coal Market Outlook
    • Coal Regions
    • Coal Trade
    • Economic Impact
    • Met / Coking Coal
    • Others
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Industry Links
    • Coal Consultants
    • Coal Industry Association
    • Coal Industry News
    • Coal Price & Market Information
    • Government Organisation
    • Think Tank
    • Coal Company
  • Newsletter
  • Videos
  • Other Hubs
    • EUROPEAN GAS HUB
    • GLOBAL LNG HUB
    • GLOBAL MARITIME HUB
  • Subscribe
  • My account
  • Login

© 2020 TheCoalHub | All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT

Energise your Friday!

Interested in coal markets? Do you want our free email each FRIDAY with at least 3 new COAL reports & presentations?

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?